Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Determine the perception of virtual education and its relationship with the mental health of human medicine students at a university in Chiclayo, Peru, during the COVID-19 health emergency. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional analytical study in a probabilistic sample of 104 students. Two questionnaires were applied: one measured virtual education from 12 valid and reliable items (α=0.98), and the other a self-report questionnaire (SQR) that measured mental health from 28 items and high reliability (α= 0.90). Results: The sample was characterized by an average age of 23.9 years and a predominance of women (61.5%). The perception of virtual education was bad in 35.6%, regular in 34.6% and good in 29.8%; Likewise, 44.2% presented high risk and 55.8% without mental health risk. An inverse correlation was observed between the “skills” dimension of virtual education with mental health risk (p=0.048, Rho= -0.27); but not with the general perception of virtual education. Conclusions: More than half of the students perceived virtual education as bad or average, which was not related to the greater mental health risk in them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burga-Flores et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: