Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 6, 2024CancersOpen Access

Navigating Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Management through Fukuoka Consensus vs. European Evidence-Based Guidelines on Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms—A Study on Two European Centers

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VDVladimir DjordjevićDKDjordje KneževićBTBlaž Trotovšek

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Djordjević et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e65d1eb6db6435875eba83https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112156
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Danish Pancreatic Cancer Group consensus guidelines on the management of pancreatic IPMN2026
  2. 2Assessing the accuracy of the international evidence-based Kyoto guidelines for detecting malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas2025
  3. 3Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspective on Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Diagnosis, Characterization and Indications for Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy, Advanced Endoscopic Ultrasound Imaging Techniques and Role of Pancreatoscopy2026
  4. 4Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a comprehensive analysis combining genetic, immunopathological and clinical management2026
  5. 5Comparison of four current guidelines on predicting advanced neoplasia in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas2024