A couple of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) attributes strongly predict adverse remodeling after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, but the value of incorporating high-risk CMR attributes, particularly in patients with non-reduced ejection fraction, remains undetermined. This study sought to evaluate the independent and incremental predictive value of a multiparametric CMR approach for adverse remodeling after STEMI across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) categories. A total of 157 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled. Adverse remodeling was defined as ≥20% enlargement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume from index admission to 3 months follow-up. Adverse remodeling occurred in 23.6% of patients. After adjustment for clinical risk factors, a stroke volume index <29.6 mL/m2, a global longitudinal strain >-7.5%, an infarct size >39.2%, a microvascular obstruction >4.9%, and a myocardial salvage index <36.4 were independently associated with adverse remodeling. The incidence of adverse remodeling increased with the increasing number of high-risk CMR attributes, regardless of LVEF (LVEF ≤40%: P=0.026; 40%<LVEF<50%: P=0.001; LVEF ≥50%: P<0.001). The presence of ≥4 high-risk attributes was an independent predictor of LV adverse remodeling (70.0% vs. 16.8%, adjusted OR 9.68, 95 CI% 3.25-28.87, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the number of high-risk CMR attributes had incremental predictive value over reduced LVEF and baseline clinical risk factors (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.68; P = 0.002). High-risk CMR attributes showed a significant association with adverse remodeling after STEMI across LVEF categories. This imaging-based model provided incremental value for adverse remodeling over traditional clinical factors and LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: