Key result
Integrated CMR score improves post-STEMI adverse LV remodeling prediction over clinical assessment by ~0.13 AUC.
Why the study?
Although cardiac magnetic resonance enables comprehensive quantification of infarct size and microvascular injury after STEMI, the incremental prognostic value of a structured imaging-based risk score beyond clinical assessment for predicting adverse LV remodeling had not been definitively established.
Does an Integrated CMR Risk Score improve early prediction of adverse left ventricular remodeling compared to clinical assessment alone in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Cohort (n=268)
Yes
Does an Integrated CMR Risk Score improve early prediction of adverse left ventricular remodeling compared to clinical assessment alone in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
An integrated CMR risk score combining infarct size, microvascular injury, and baseline LV volume significantly outperforms clinical assessment alone in predicting adverse LV remodeling after STEMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance post-STEMI risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact before clinical adoption.
Background Adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a principal mechanistic driver of subsequent heart failure and mortality. Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) enables comprehensive quantification of infarct size and microvascular injury, the incremental prognostic value of a structured imaging-based risk score beyond clinical assessment has not been definitively established. Purpose To develop and internally validate an Integrated CMR Risk Score for early prediction of adverse LV remodeling following primary PCI. Methods Consecutive STEMI patients from the multicenter SINERGY-ACUTE project, undergoing early CMR (n=268), were evaluated. Adverse remodeling was defined as ≥20% increase in LV end-systolic volume or ≥10% decline in LVEF at follow-up. Independent predictors were identified using penalized multivariable logistic regression. The Integrated CMR Risk Score (0–5 points) incorporated: infarct size (highest tertile, 2 points), LVESV above median (1 point), presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO, 1 point), and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH, 1 point). Model discrimination was assessed by ROC analysis with DeLong testing. Incremental value was evaluated using ΔAUC, Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI). Internal validation used 1000-bootstrap resampling. Calibration and decision curve analyses were performed. Results A total of 268 STEMI patients with early CMR was included in the study of whom 18 patients fulfilled criteria for adverse LV remodeling during the follow-up. Independent predictors of adverse LV remodeling were: infarct size (per 5% increase: OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15–1.42; p<0.001), LVESV (per 10 mL: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10–1.35; p<0.001), MVO (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.48–3.09; p<0.001), and IMH (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.72–4.13; p<0.001). Clinical model AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.62–0.70) versus 0.79 (95% CI 0.75–0.83) for the Integrated Score (ΔAUC +0.13; p<0.001). Reclassification improved significantly (NRI 0.32; IDI 0.11; both p<0.001). Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.77. Calibration was preserved (slope 0.94; Hosmer–Lemeshow p>0.20). Remodeling rates increased stepwise (9%, 24%, 51% across score strata). Conclusions An Integrated CMR Risk Score combining infarct size, microvascular injury, and baseline LV remodeling parameters provides statistically robust, independently validated, and clinically meaningful prediction of adverse LV remodeling after STEMI, substantially outperforming clinical assessment alone and enabling early high-risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popadić et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=268). Integrated CMR Risk Score (0-5 points incorporating infarct size, LVESV, MVO, and IMH) vs. Clinical risk model alone was evaluated on Adverse left ventricular remodeling (≥20% increase in LV end-systolic volume or ≥10% decline in LVEF at follow-up) (AUC 0.79 vs 0.66 (ΔAUC +0.13), 95% CI 0.75-0.83, p=<0.001). The Integrated CMR Risk Score outperformed clinical assessment alone for predicting adverse LV remodeling post-STEMI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: