Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 2024Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsOpen Access

F-24 | Trends in thrombolytic therapies for acute pulmonary embolism from 2016 – 2020

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JCJ.W. ClarkeChris O’Brien LifehouseQMQuinn MalleryLoyola University Medical CenterFGFrances GreathouseLoyola University Medical Center

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Clarke et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c5cab6db643587643e5ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101833
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reperfusion therapies in patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism: insights from a multicenter registry2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2C23-22 Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Versus Systemic Therapy in Pulmonary Embolism: A Decade of Experience From the National Inpatient Sample (2010-2021)2026
  3. 3Systemic thrombolysis vs catheter-directed interventions for the treatment of high-risk pulmonary embolism. A comparative analysis of early outcomes and complications2025
  4. 4Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Thrombolysis and Catheter-Directed Therapy in Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review2024
  5. 5Outcomes of catheter-directed versus systemic thrombolysis for the treatment of pulmonary embolism: A real-world analysis of national administrative claims2020 · 36 citations