Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the management of aortic stenosis (AS) in the last 2 decades. However, with worsening stenosis, the patient develops diastolic dysfunction & heart failure (HF) due to increased afterload. We aim to compare if TAVI is an effective option even after the HF develops. The national readmission database (2016-2020) was utilized to identify hospitalizations for TAVI. Cohorts were stratified by the presence of HF. A propensity score matching (PSM) model matched patients with & without HF. Pearson's x2 test was applied to PSM-2 matched cohorts to compare outcomes. Among, 320,304 hospitalizations for TAVI; the large majority (N: 231,497; 72.3%) had co-existing HF. After propensity matching (N=126,528), HF patients were found to have higher in-hospital mortality (1.6% vs 1.2%, aOR:1.36) acute myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 1.9%, aOR:2.3), sudden cardiac arrest (1% vs 0.7%, aOR:1.14), cardiogenic shock (2.4% vs 0.8%, aOR: 2.8), mechanical circulatory support (1% vs 0.4%, aOR:2.18) & pressor (2.8% vs 1.4%, aOR:1.55) requirement, AKI (12% vs 7.3%, aOR:1.92), acute respiratory failure (5.6% vs 2.2%, aOR:2.6) & major adverse cardiac events (7.9% vs 5.1%, aOR:1.5) [p<0.001] From 2016-2020; peri-procedural mortality of TAVR has decreased from 1.6% to 1.2% (p-trend:0.006) Patients with HF also have longer LOS and resource utilization (p<0.05). In severe Aortic stenosis, the development of HF is a strong predictor of higher mortality and worse clinical outcomes after TAVI implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: