Aims Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG) has evolved as a potential tool for the assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony. We sought to determine whether changes in ventricular dyssynchrony at the time of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, measured using UHF-ECG, relate to post-implantation left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR). Methods and Results Patients undergoing CRT (n = 46; aged 70.3 ± 11.2 years; 37/46 male) underwent intra-operative UHF-ECG assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony before and after CRT. Multiple frequency bands (n=16) within the 150 to 1000Hz range were used to create ventricular depolarization maps (Figure). Ventricular dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was assessed using the maximum time difference in ms between the QRS complex centres of mass of leads V1 to V6. Left ventricular reverse remodelling was defined in terms of a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 3 months post-implantation. During implantation, CRT led to a 103% reduction in e-DYS from 36.6 ms during AAI pacing to 1.4 ms during CRT (P<0.001). CRT also led to a reduction in QRS duration (from 156.3 ms during AAI pacing to 119.9 ms during CRT [P<0.001]) and QRS area (from 100.5 ms*mV (or µVs) during AAI pacing to 65.6 ms during CRT [P<0.001]). In regression analyses, intra-operative Δ e-DYS (ms) was associated with ΔLVESV at 3 months (Figure). In contrast, no associations were observed between intra-operative ΔQRS duration or ΔQRS area and ΔLVESV. Conclusion Intra-operative Δ e-DYS derived from UHF-ECG, relates to LVRR after CRT. In contrast, no such relationship emerged for ΔQRS or ΔQRS area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zegard et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: