Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly reduced the ultra-high-frequency QRS dyssynchrony (e-DYS) parameter by 46 ms at 6 months in responder patients (p<10e-10).
Why the study?
Objective assessment of the effect of CRT remains a difficult clinical task, and ultra-high-frequency ECG dyssynchrony could provide helpful information about ventricular electrical depolarization.
Does ultra-high-frequency ECG dyssynchrony (e-DYS) improve the assessment of immediate and long-term effects of CRT compared to standard QRS duration?
Observational (n=42)
No
Does ultra-high-frequency ECG dyssynchrony (e-DYS) improve the assessment of immediate and long-term effects of CRT compared to standard QRS duration?
Ultra-high-frequency ECG dyssynchrony (e-DYS) appears superior to standard QRS duration for assessing immediate and long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Objective assessment of the effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) still represents a very difficult clinical task. The ultra-high-frequency electrocardiographic (ECG) dyssynchrony (e-DYS) represents a simple ECG derived method that provides information about the ventricular electrical depolarization and thus could become helpful in CRT. The 12-lead ECG (sampling 5kHz/24bits) and echocardiography were obtained in 42 consecutive CRT patients. The e-DYS and standard QRS duration (QRSd) were automatically assessed before, just after, and 6 months after the CRT during CRT Off and CRT On. In 30 CRT responders determined by echocardiography, the e-DYS parameter was significantly lower after 6 months during CRT Off compared to state prior CRT (-919ms, p<0.05), while there was no significant e-DYS change during CRT On within 6 months NS). A clear shortage of e-DYS was observed just after CRT On (-4623ms, p<10e - 10 ), and 6 months after CRT On (-4621ms, p<10e -10 ) compared to state before CRT. No significant changes of the e-DYS parameter were found in 12 CRT nonresponders. The QRSd didn't show any significance in all observed changes. The e-DYS parameter seems to be a superior parameter to simply and quickly assess an immediate as well as the long-term effect in CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leinveber et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (n=42). Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) vs. Before CRT was evaluated on Change in e-DYS parameter 6 months after CRT On compared to before CRT in CRT responders (p=<10e-10). Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly reduced the ultra-high-frequency QRS dyssynchrony (e-DYS) parameter by 46 ms at 6 months in responder patients (p<10e-10).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: