You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Basic Research & Pathophysiology (PD53)1 May 2024PD53-05 CRITICAL DIFFERENCES IN SEMEN AND URINE MICROBIOME MANIFEST IN MEN WITH ABNORMAL SPERM PARAMETERS Vadim Osadchiy, Andre Belarmino, Reza Kianian, John T. Sigalos, Thiago P. Furtado, Jacob S. Ancira, Trisha Kanie, Sarah F. Magnum, Craig D. Tipton, Tung-Chin M. Hsieh, Jesse N. Mills, and Sriram V. Eleswarapu Vadim OsadchiyVadim Osadchiy , Andre BelarminoAndre Belarmino , Reza KianianReza Kianian , John T. SigalosJohn T. Sigalos , Thiago P. FurtadoThiago P. Furtado , Jacob S. AnciraJacob S. Ancira , Trisha KanieTrisha Kanie , Sarah F. MagnumSarah F. Magnum , Craig D. TiptonCraig D. Tipton , Tung-Chin M. HsiehTung-Chin M. Hsieh , Jesse N. MillsJesse N. Mills , and Sriram V. EleswarapuSriram V. Eleswarapu View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001009456.01770.91.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In up to 30% of men, a cause for abnormal semen analysis (SA) parameters cannot be identified. Recent pilot studies with limited sample sizes have implicated a role for the microbiome in male fertility. Here, we aimed to identify seminal and urinary microbiota that may contribute to the etiopathogenesis of abnormal SA parameters. METHODS: Men presenting for fertility evaluation or for vasectomy consultation with proven biological paternity were recruited. Clinical data, semen, and urine were collected. Participants were then stratified according to alterations in SA parameters. Samples underwent 16S rRNA sequencing followed by taxonomic microbiome community profiling. RESULTS: 73 participants were included in the study and were stratified based on alterations, or lack thereof, in SA parameters. Men with impaired sperm motility (N=27) showed a three-fold higher abundance of semen L. iners (p=0.046) and an almost fifty-fold higher abundance of urine D. micraerophilus (p=0.032) compared to men with normal sperm motility (N=46). These relationships persisted on canonical correlational analysis (L. iners: r=0.39, p=0.011; D. micraerophilus: r=0.44, p=0.014; Figure 1). Men with abnormal sperm concentration (N=20) showed a higher abundance of semen P. fluorescens (p=0.010) and semen P. stutzeri (p=0.024), but a lower abundance of semen P. putida (p=0.005), urine E. faecalis (p=0.012), and urine S. aureus (p=0.037), compared to men with normal sperm concentration (N=53). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight a critical group of seminal and urinary microorganisms associated with abnormalities in sperm motility and concentration. These data support findings from previously published, smaller studies, while also providing target microorganisms for future mechanistic investigations into the complex relationship between the microbiome and male infertility. Download PPT Source of Funding: This work was supported in part by the 2023 Urology Care Foundation Residency Research Award Program and the Russell Scott, Jr., MD, Urology Research Fund © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e1139 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Vadim Osadchiy More articles by this author Andre Belarmino More articles by this author Reza Kianian More articles by this author John T. Sigalos More articles by this author Thiago P. Furtado More articles by this author Jacob S. Ancira More articles by this author Trisha Kanie More articles by this author Sarah F. Magnum More articles by this author Craig D. Tipton More articles by this author Tung-Chin M. Hsieh More articles by this author Jesse N. Mills More articles by this author Sriram V. Eleswarapu More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osadchiy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: