This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Lincoln and Guba provided some principles and four evaluative criteria called “trustworthiness” to guide social science research naturalistically. However, drawing on Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature, a field engaged with methods and practices of science for several decades, one can argue that this approach is not still fully naturalistic. In this paper, we review Lincoln and Guba’s four criteria of trustworthiness from an STS perspective. We argue that the STS literature can challenge these criteria, but at the same time they have the potential to be reconstructed with the help of the materials STS provides.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman Sharifzadeh (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: