Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 29, 2007New Directions for Evaluation

Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TSThomas A. SchwandtUniversity of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignYLYvonna S. LincolnTexas A&M UniversityEGEgon G. GubaDePaul University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Schwandt et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b7f6cab2ce391a5ca2152https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation1986 · 3,709 citations
  2. 2Fourth-Generation Evaluation1988 · 5,981 citations
  3. 3Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches1983 · 1,353 citations