Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study pertains to the selection of the appropriate process parameters of lipid extraction aimed at the valorization of sea-bass gutting and filleting side stream biomass. A comparative kinetic study between an environmentally friendly polar (ethanol) and a conventional non-polar solvent (hexane) was implemented to determine the effect of temperature, solvent to solid ratio and time, providing insights in terms of the yield recovery and quality of omega-3 fatty acids. Maximum recovery yield (43.8 and 34.0 g/100 g of dried gutting and filleting by-products, respectively) was achieved within 10 min. In gutting by-products, ethanol achieved full lipid recovery at 35 °C and a 50:1 ratio, while for hexane, the maximum yield was 83%. In the case of filleting side-streams, hexane achieved exhaustive recovery at a 50:1 ratio and 20 °C compared with ethanol, where a higher temperature (50 °C) was needed for exhaustive recovery to be achieved. Differences were attributed to the diverse fatty acid profiles among the two by-products, with 27.3% and 40.8% polyunsaturated fatty acids in viscera and fish frames, respectively. All extracts at 20 °C and 35 °C remained below the oxidation limit set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (peroxide value < 5 meqO2/kgoil; p-anisidine value < 20). Therefore, green solvents could assist conventional extraction, combining high efficiency and an improved environmental impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Semenoglou et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: