Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of integrating problembased learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) in clinical anesthesia education, specifically focusing on neuraxial anesthesia.Methods: A total of 100 interns were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=50) or the traditional group (n=50).The experimental group received anesthesia education using a combined PBL-CBL approach, while the traditional group received conventional didactic lectures.The interns' performance was evaluated through post-class quiz scores and procedural skills scores.A satisfaction survey was conducted to assess overall satisfaction with teaching, and self-evaluations were used to measure interns' perceptions of the learning experience.Results: The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores on post-class quizzes and procedural skills compared to the traditional group (p<0.05).The overall satisfaction rate was also significantly higher in the experimental group (p<0.05).Additionally, the self-evaluations revealed that the experimental group reported significantly higher scores in five dimensions: enhancing learning motivation, fostering interest, promoting collaboration, improving critical thinking, and enhancing clinical skills (p<0.05).Conclusion: The integration of PBL and CBL in clinical anesthesia education, specifically in the context of neuraxial anesthesia, proves effective in improving knowledge acquisition, procedural skills, satisfaction levels, and self-perceptions of learning among interns.This approach holds promise for enhancing the quality of clinical anesthesia education and preparing future anesthesiologists for clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: