This research is part of the development of critical thinking skills instruments in physics lessons for eleventh-grade high school students. In this section, the purpose of this study is to analyze the content validity of the instrument. The instruments developed consist of 20 multiple-choice questions constructed based on indicators of critical thinking skills, namely interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. Furthermore, this instrument was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by 6 experts with assessment aspects including: 1) The questions fit the CTS indicator, 2) The stimulus/stem fits the questions, 3) The questions are clearly formulated, and 4) The problem description is clear and unambiguous.The method used in this research is a descriptive analysis method for content validation based on Aikens' Formula. Data for content validation were obtained from 9 experts, comprising 6 lecturers and 3 physics teachers from high schools in Jakarta. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that 20 items of the complex multiple-choice test instrument to measure the critical thinking ability of eleventh-grade high school physics students are declared valid based on Aiken's Validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhakti et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: