Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey insights reveal potential for virtual classification in para rowing, suggesting improved accessibility and efficiency.
Classification is required for Paralympic sports, providing competitive structure for athletes with disabilities that minimizes the impact of impairment on results. Objectives Athlete assessment for para rowing classification has initiated use of virtual assessments over teleconferencing. This study explores the experiences of classifiers, athletes, and national rowing federations during virtual classification and provides recommendations for potential future use. Design Participants in virtual classification assessments were invited to complete one of two online surveys specific to their roles. Surveys contained a mix of open- and closed-ended questions, with five-point Likert scale questions exploring agreement. Results Twenty-eight participants responded. Although 96% (27/28) of participants agreed that in-person classification remains the gold-standard for classification prior to competing in World Rowing regattas, 82% (23/28) agreed that virtual classification is a viable option to inform initial athlete classification. Results suggest a need for standardized processes addressing use of communication technology, preparation of in-person assessor, respectful environment for athletes, and managing potential risk of error. Conclusion Further exploration of use of virtual classification processes is warranted to establish best practices. In-person classification remains a requirement of para rowing participation; however, virtual assessment addresses cost savings and initial classification needs of national rowing federations without trained para rowing classifiers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: