Observational analysis examined indications for surgical aortic valve replacement and outcomes in elderly patients, highlighting the continuing role of SAVR.
Objectives:The 2017 and 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease recommend transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as a treatment option for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS) in patients ≥75 years of age. However, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remains a viable option for elderly patients, particularly in specific anatomical or clinical subsets. The objective of this study was to analyze indications for SAVR and postoperative outcomes in patients ≥75 years of age. Methods:Between 2017 and 2022, 43 patients underwent isolated SAVR. Indications included low operative risk (51.2%), bicuspid valve (21%), patient preference (13.9%), and challenging anatomy (13.9%). Outcomes followed VARC-3 criteria. Results:Technical success was 100%, with 0% 30-day mortality and low PPM (4.6%). ICU and hospital stays averaged 2.9 and 12.5 days, respectively. Cardiovascular mortality was 4.6% over 5.5 years. Conclusions:SAVR remains a viable option in select elderly patients with complex anatomy, achieving excellent outcomes when guided by heart team evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petersen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: