Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis of MEMS eye trackers reveals digital twins improve accuracy and reduce recalibration needs.
The development of high-performance MEMS-based eye trackers, crucial for next-generation medical diagnostics and human–computer interfaces, is often hampered by the mechanical instability and time-consuming recalibration of physical prototypes. To address this bottleneck, we present the development and rigorous validation of a high-fidelity digital twin (DT) designed to accelerate the design–test–refine cycle. We conducted a comparative study of a physical MEMS scanning system and its corresponding digital twin using a USAF 1951 test target under both static and dynamic conditions. Our analysis reveals that the DT accurately replicates the physical system’s behavior, showing a geometric discrepancy of <30 µm and a matching feature shift (1 µm error) caused by tracking dynamics. Crucially, the DT effectively removes mechanical vibration artifacts, enabling the precise analysis of system parameters in a controlled virtual environment. The validated model was then used to develop a pupil detection algorithm that achieved an accuracy of 1.80 arc minutes, a result that surpasses the performance of a widely used commercial system in our comparative tests. This work establishes a validated methodology for using digital twins in the rapid prototyping and optimization of complex optical systems, paving the way for faster development of critical healthcare technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pomianek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: