Review demonstrates angiogenesis mechanisms and biomarkers, indicating tailored therapies for cancer and ischemic diseases.
Angiogenesis is a highly coordinated process essential for development, tissue homeostasis, and repair. In physiologic settings, endothelial cells remain quiescent until transient hypoxia- or injury-induced surges of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), FGF (fibroblast growth factor), and other pro-angiogenic cues activate receptor tyrosine kinases, triggering MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and PI3K-AKT (phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT) cascades that drive sprouting, proliferation, migration, and vessel stabilization via pericyte recruitment and balanced Ang (angiopoietin)-Tie2 (tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2) signaling. In non-malignant pathologies, targeted pro-angiogenic therapies harness these mechanisms to restore perfusion in ischemic heart disease, chronic wounds, and neurovascular degeneration. In contrast, tumor-driven "malignant" angiogenesis subverts the same core pathways in both hypoxia-dependent and -independent manners. Oncogenic RAS (rat sarcoma)-RAF (rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma)-MEK (MAPK/ERK kinase) and PI3K-AKT activity locks VEGFR2 (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2) Tyr1175 in a phosphorylated state, fueling unchecked endothelial proliferation and survival. Overexpression of integrin αvβ₃ (alpha-v beta-3) and NRP2 (neuropilin 2) amplifies FAK (focal adhesion kinase)-Src-mediated invasion, while glycocalyx shedding and uneven pericyte coverage produce leaky vasculature. Transient vessel normalization upon VEGF blockade is followed by adaptive resistance via HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor)-driven upregulation of FGF2, Ang-2 (angiopoietin-2), and HGF (hepatocyte growth factor)/c-Met pathways, necessitating complex combination regimens. Rationally distinguishing when to inhibit versus augment angiogenesis is therefore clinically decisive, because cancers demand vascular suppression/normalization whereas ischemic and degenerative disorders benefit from controlled pro-angiogenic repair. We compared malignant and non-malignant angiogenesis at the molecular and clinical levels, critically appraising therapies, from VEGF antibodies and multitarget TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) to pro-angiogenic growth factors and drug-delivery platforms, and their respective biomarkers (Ang-2, soluble VEGFR2, VEGF isoform ratios). By explicitly linking pathway mechanics to therapeutic choice, dosing, and biomarker-guided selection, this review provides a comprehensive roadmap for tailoring angiogenesis-targeted interventions, either to restrain pathological neovascularization in cancer or to promote reparative vessel growth in ischemic and degenerative disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izadpanah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: