Mixed-methods design evaluated teachers’ attitudes toward project consultancy in project-based learning, suggesting tools for teacher development.
This study addresses a critical gap in educational research by developing a valid and reliable scale to measure teachers’ attitudes toward project consultancy an increasingly significant role in project-based learning environments. Despite the growing importance of teacher involvement in guiding student projects, tools for assessing teachers’ consultancy attitudes remain limited. Using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, the study began with semi-structured interviews ( n = 10) to identify core themes, leading to the creation of an item pool. A preliminary version of the scale was administered to 382 teachers for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), revealing a four-factor structure—evaluation, execution, planning, and completion—explaining 61.9% of the variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a separate sample ( n = 194) confirmed the model fit (χ 2 / df = 2.4, CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.08). The final 20-item scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .89). Notably, female teachers scored significantly higher than male teachers on the evaluation subdimension. The Project Consultancy Attitude Scale offers researchers and educational practitioners a psychometrically sound instrument to evaluate and support teacher development in project-based learning context
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tongal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: