Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 2025Comparative Southeast European StudiesOpen Access

Strategic Rebalancing in the Contested Global Order: The United States’ Cost–Benefit Analysis of Foreign Policy Regarding Greece and Türkiye in the Eastern Mediterranean

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VMVildan Meydan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis demonstrates strategic balancing toward Greece and Türkiye, suggesting US foreign policy reflects political dynamics and deterrence.

Key Points

  • US foreign policy increasingly relies on cost–benefit analysis rooted in deterrence and political dynamics.
  • Greece is viewed as a reliable partner, while Türkiye faces negative balancing due to strategic costs.
  • The approach integrates rationalist and neoclassical realist theories to balance partner reliability and value.
  • US strategies are shaped by material calculations intertwined with normative concerns like alliance credibility.

Cite This Study

Vildan Meydan (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69254f9ec0ce034ddc35a16ehttps://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2024-0065
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Turkey Between NATO and the Russia-China-Iran Axis: Anatomy of a Strategic Balancing Act2026
  2. 2The Evolving Balance of Power between Greece and Türkiye2025
  3. 3Hedging strategy of Turkey in great power competition2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Strategic Leverage and Regional Balancing: Türkiye’s Role in Trump’s Middle East Agenda and The Shifting Architecture of Regional Power2025
  5. 5The milestones of U.S.–Türkiye cooperation in the early 21st century: economic, military and political aspects2026