PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Breast Cancer Research and Treatment0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of concurrent lobular carcinoma in situ on recurrence outcomes in patients with classic and pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

View Full Paper
MKMandeep KaurAQAstrid QuirarteAVAnna Vertido

Key Points

  • ILC with lobular carcinoma in situ showed improved recurrence-free survival in pleomorphic cases, differing by subtype.
  • Significantly better RFS was associated with ILC + LCIS (HR 0.31) compared to ILC-alone in pleomorphic cases.
  • This retrospective analysis assessed outcomes in stage I-III invasive lobular carcinoma at a single institution.
  • Findings highlight the varied impact of lobular carcinoma in situ on treatment and tumor characteristics across subtypes.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose We investigated outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) with or without concurrent lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) in patients with classic or pleomorphic ILC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a single-institution database of patients with stage I-III ILC. We compared tumor features, treatment, and recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with ILC-alone versus ILC + LCIS stratified by ILC tumor subtype. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. Results Of the 786 cases of ILC, 542 were classic and 92 were pleomorphic, with 70.6% overall having concurrent LCIS. Overall, ILC + LCIS cases were less often T3 (p = 0.037) and had lower rates of N2/N3 disease (p = 0.026) than ILC-alone. Concomitant LCIS was also associated with greater progesterone receptor (PR) positivity (p = 0.016), and was more commonly grade 2 and less often grade 1 compared to ILC-alone (p = 0.008). Treatment differed, with ILC + LCIS cases receiving less chemotherapy (p = 0.016) and more mastectomy (p = 0.015). Among patients with classic ILC, the presence of concomitant LCIS was not associated with different RFS. However, among those with pleomorphic ILC, ILC + LCIS was associated with significantly improved RFS compared to ILC-alone (HR 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.96, p = 0.043). Conclusion While the presence of LCIS was not associated with RFS in classic ILC in this dataset, it is a favorable prognostic factor in pleomorphic ILC, suggesting a potentially differential role in ILC subtypes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaur et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b9da01d383f2b2a37a21ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07864-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma2023 · 6 citations
  2. 2Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: An aggressive tumor showing apocrine differentiation1992 · 252 citations
  3. 3The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: Pathology of atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ2003 · 128 citations
  4. 4Lobular Neoplasia in Breast Core Needle Biopsy Specimens Is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Invasive Carcinoma2002 · 84 citations
  5. 5Mitotic score and pleomorphic histology in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: impact on disease-free survival2020 · 7 citations