Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thematic analysis reveals user satisfaction driven by ease of use in mobile applications across state agencies.
This research assesses Indonesia's digital public service ecosystem by analyzing 50 mobile applications from a wide range of state agencies. Using a computational content analysis of metadata and user reviews from the Google Play Store, this study presents a dual-faceted evaluation. First, a thematic analysis of negative reviews (1-2 stars) reveals that user grievances are overwhelmingly dominated by foundational issues, such as login/access problems, slow performance, and technical glitches, rather than a lack of advanced features. Second, a corresponding analysis of positive reviews (5 stars) identifies that user satisfaction is primarily driven by high-quality features, ease of use, and overall application reliability. Quantitative findings show significant performance disparities across institutional categories, with Ministrydeveloped apps receiving the lowest average user satisfaction. An Importance-Performance Quadrant Analysis further uncovers a critical paradox: many high-download, mandatory apps suffer from low user ratings, indicating a clear disconnect between enforced adoption and usercentric quality. The research concludes that enhancing digital public services requires a strategic shift from feature proliferation to foundational reliability. Ensuring robust core functionalities is paramount to building citizen trust and achieving a successful digital transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijaya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: