Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework promotes sustainability in university Fab Labs, indicating a shift towards polycentric governance for shared resources.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution has reshaped shared spaces in higher education, with manufacturing labs (Fab Labs) emerging as vital hubs for collaboration. However, a systematic framework for ensuring their long-term sustainability as shared resources is lacking. This study addresses this gap by conceptualizing the university Fab Lab as a ‘commons’ and applying Elinor Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. We propose a new analytical framework for sustainable space sharing, reconstructed from Ostrom’s principles into three university policy domains: Resource Policy (Rp), Actor/User Policy (Ap), and Community/Governance Policy (C/Gp). To validate this framework, we conduct a case study of the ‘Idea Factory’ at Seoul National University, analyzing its operational policies in conjunction with global standards like the Fab Charter. The proposed framework provides practical guidance for establishing spatial policies and architectural plans that emphasize autonomy, adaptability, and polycentric governance. It offers a new paradigm for sustainability in university commons by integrating bottom-up community approaches with robust institutional design, providing a theoretical foundation for implementing effective sharing schemes in rapidly evolving educational environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: