Why the study?
Anatomic and physiological changes from severe aortic stenosis may influence functional coronary stenosis evaluation; changes in resting and hyperemic indices before and immediately after TAVI remain to be fully characterized.
Does TAVI alter epicardial functional indices (FFR, RFR, Pd/Pa) and coronary microvascular function in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does TAVI alter epicardial functional indices (FFR, RFR, Pd/Pa) and coronary microvascular function in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
TAVI induces a small but significant immediate reduction in FFR and RFR, though FFR maintains higher pre- and post-procedure concordance than resting indices, suggesting it may be a more stable metric for assessing coronary lesions in severe aortic stenosis.
FFR may remain more stable than resting indices for lesion assessment around TAVI; leaves open effects on microvascular function in severe aortic stenosis.
BACKGROUND: The anatomic and physiological changes associated with severe aortic stenosis may influence the functional evaluation of coronary stenoses. In this study, we aimed to assess changes in functional resting and hyperemic indices before and immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and their relationship with microvascular resistance. METHODS: In this pooled analysis of 3 prospective observational studies, fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and resting distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) were measured in patients with severe aortic stenosis before and after TAVI in the left anterior descending artery. Coronary microcirculation was also assessed using thermodilution-based methods, with microvascular resistance reserve (cutoff ≤3) used to identify coronary microvascular dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included. Baseline Pd/Pa, RFR, and FFR measurements were 0.93±0.04, 0.90±0.07, and 0.89±0.07, respectively. Immediately post-TAVI, a small but significant decrease was observed for both RFR and FFR (RFR, 0.88±0.08; FFR, 0.88±0.08; P <0.05 for all). Coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance reserve also remained unchanged. Applying the established cutoff values, 16 (12.7%) vessels had a positive FFR, while a higher proportion of vessels were positive for Pd/Pa and RFR (35.7% and 43.7%, respectively; P <0.001). The concordance between pre- and post-TAVI FFR was higher (92.8%) compared with Pd/Pa (75.4%) and RFR (73.8%) ( P <0.001 for both). The rate of disagreement between resting and hyperemic indices remained unchanged, regardless of the presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI is associated with a small but significant reduction in FFR and RFR immediately post-procedure. Overall, the agreement between pre- and post-TAVI values of FFR was higher compared with resting indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallinoro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: