Key result
TAVI linked to ~54% increase in CFR, driven by reduced resting coronary blood flow.
Why the study?
Severe AS impairs myocardial blood flow, an effect exacerbated by CAD, but whether TAVI promotes reversal of these pathophysiological conditions remained to be assessed.
Does TAVI improve myocardial blood flow and microvascular resistance in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concurrent coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=7)
Does TAVI improve myocardial blood flow and microvascular resistance in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concurrent coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.35% vs 1.53%
p-value: p=0.037
TAVI improves coronary flow reserve in patients with severe AS and CAD, primarily driven by a reduction in resting coronary blood flow due to reduced myocardial demand and LV mass regression.
Hypothesis-generating for TAVI effect on coronary flow in severe AS with CAD; prospective studies needed before practice change.
Background Severe aortic stenosis (AS) causes a pathophysiological cascade, which impairs myocardial blood flow. This effect is exacerbated in the presence of coronary disease (CAD). Treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may promote reversal of these pathophysiological conditions. Methods We performed multimodality assessment of cardiac physiology in patients with AS and concurrent CAD requiring percutaneous coronary intervention, prior to and 6 months after undergoing TAVI. Techniques include: coronary angiography and bolus thermodilution-derived indices of microvascular function (coronary flow reserve (CFR); index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR)); stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, which was used to measure changes in global myocardial blood flow (MBF) and left ventricular mass (LVM), and computed resting and hyperaemic vessel specific absolute coronary flow (aCBF) and microvascular resistance (MVR) using a computational model of coronary physiology. Results Data were obtained for seven patients (10 vessels). CFR increased from 1.53 (1.2–1.7) to 2.35 (2.0–2.7) (p=0.037) 6 months post-TAVI. There was a 33% reduction in resting aCBF from 218 mL/min to 146 mL/min (p=0.004). On CMR, resting MBF fell 37% from 3.0±0.98 mL/min/g to 1.9±0.7 mL/min/g (p=0.033) and stress MBF fell 25% from 3.6±0.57 mL/min/g to 2.7±0.7 mL/min/g (p=0.004). Indexed LVM regressed from 79±14 g/m 2 to 71±16 g/m 2 (p=0.006). MVR remained unchanged. Conclusions CFR increased following TAVI. The mechanism for this was a significant reduction in resting coronary blood flow measured with CMR and modelled computationally. The unchanged MVR and IMR suggest that resting blood flow reduces due to reduced myocardial demand and myocardial remodelling, rather than changes in resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yones et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis and concurrent coronary artery disease (n=7). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Baseline (pre-TAVI) was evaluated on Coronary flow reserve (CFR) (p=0.037). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation significantly increased coronary flow reserve from 1.53 to 2.35 (p=0.037) at 6 months, driven by a reduction in resting coronary blood flow.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: