PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 10, 2026ESC Heart Failure0 citationsOpen Access

Novel biomarkers distinguish heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction

View Full Paper
CHCamilla A HageAMAnnika MangJDJ DAUBERT

Key Result

Higher MYBPC3 and FGF23 levels distinguished HFrEF from HFpEF, with MYBPC3 being most prognostic in HFrEF (HR 1.62) and ANGPT2 in HFpEF (HR 1.45).

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify biomarkers that can distinguish between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their clinical implications.
  • Measured 19 plasma biomarkers in two groups: HFpEF and HFrEF.
  • Employed novel assays specifically for seven biomarkers.
  • Analyzed associations between biomarkers, clinical characteristics, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
  • Conducted statistical analyses to determine the prognostic significance of the biomarkers.
  • Higher MYBPC3 and FGF23 levels effectively differentiated HFrEF from HFpEF.
  • MYBPC3 was particularly prognostic in HFrEF, while ANGPT2 and IGFBP7 were informative in HFpEF.
  • Most biomarkers, except DKK3, were linked to worse clinical outcomes such as death and hospitalization for HF.

Structured PICO

Do novel plasma biomarkers distinguish between HFpEF and HFrEF and predict clinical outcomes?

P
Population
112 patients with heart failure, comprising HFpEF (n=76, age 73, 50% female) and HFrEF (n=36, age 63, 14% female).
I
Intervention
Measurement of 19 plasma biomarkers, including 7 novel research assays (ANGPT2, BMP10, DKK3, FABP3, FGF23, IGFBP7, and MYBPC3).
C
Comparator
Comparison between HFpEF and HFrEF cohorts.
O
Outcome
Discrimination between LVEF categories (HFpEF vs HFrEF).surrogate

Novel biomarkers MYBPC3 and FGF23 can distinguish HFrEF from HFpEF, supporting the hypothesis that primary cardiomyocyte injury drives HFrEF while systemic inflammation and oxidative stress drive HFpEF.

Abstract

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction may be driven by different pathophysiologies. We explored novel biomarkers, associations with clinical characteristics, discrimination between LVEF categories and associations with outcomes. Methods and Results In HFpEF(n=76) and HFrEF(n=36), 19 plasma biomarkers were measured including seven novel research assays for ANGPT2, BMP10, DKK3, FABP3, FGF23, IGFBP7 and MYBPC3. HFpEF patients were older (73 vs 63 years), more often female (50% vs 14%). All seven novel biomarkers except FABP3 tended to be higher in HFrEF vs HFpEF and associated with worse NYHA class and lower eGFR in both LVEF categories. MYBPC3 and FGF23 (higher in HFrEF) discriminated best between LVEF categories (AUC 85.8 and 80.0 respectively). In HFpEF, higher ANGPT2 was associated with worse right (TAPSE:β=-1.03;p=0.04) and left ventricular function (LV-GLS; β=1.29;p=0.03) and left atrial strain (LA-GLS:β=5.03;p0.001) whereas higher IGFBP7 and MYBPC3 with diastolic dysfunction (E/e´:β=4.09;p=0.02 and β=1.36;p=0.01 respectively). All biomarkers except DKK3 were positively associated with the outcome (HFpEF:all-cause death, HF-hospitalization;HFrEF: all-cause death, LVAD or heart transplantation). Specifically (ANGPT2 (HR 1.4595% CI 1.00-2.13) more strongly in HFpEF and IGFBP7 (2.510.95-6.64) more strongly in HFrEF (MYBPC3 (1.620.99-2.64). Conclusion Among seven novel biomarker assays, higher MYBPC3 (reflecting muscle injury and myopathy) and FGF23 (endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress) distinguished HFrEF from HFpEF. Higher MYBPC3 was most prognostic in HFrEF while higher ANGPT2 and IGFBP7 (endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress) in HFpEF. These hypothesis-generating findings support primary cardiomyocyte injury as a driver of HFrEF and systemic inflammation and oxidative stress as a driver of HFpEF. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00774709

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hage et al. (2026) studied this question. Higher MYBPC3 and FGF23 levels distinguished HFrEF from HFpEF, with MYBPC3 being most prognostic in HFrEF (HR 1.62) and ANGPT2 in HFpEF (HR 1.45).

synapsesocial.com/papers/696321bb91e05aa366cb7fc2https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvaf011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper