Key result
MRI-guided EMB forceps show reliable visibility and accurate tissue sampling in preclinical tests.
Why the study?
Does an MR-compatible prototype EMB forceps perform comparably to standard forceps in preclinical models for MRI-guided endomyocardial biopsy?
Does an MR-compatible prototype EMB forceps perform comparably to standard forceps in preclinical models for MRI-guided endomyocardial biopsy?
p-value: p=>0.05
An MR-compatible prototype endomyocardial biopsy forceps demonstrated reliable visibility, handling, and accurate tissue sampling in a structured preclinical evaluation protocol, supporting its potential for MRI-guided interventions.
Supports MRI-guided EMB device development in models; leaves open human translation pending clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: MRI-guided cardiovascular procedures provide high-resolution, radiation-free imaging, but clinical translation is limited due to the lack of MR Conditional medical devices. This study presents a structured preclinical evaluation protocol for MRI-guided endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) interventions, demonstrating its feasibility for both instrument performance and procedural workflow. METHODS: An MR-compatible prototype EMB forceps was evaluated using the three-stage preclinical protocol. First, device visibility was assessed using fluoroscopy and two MRI systems (Magnetom Sola 1.5T and a Biograph 3.0T, both Siemens Healthineers). Tissue samples retrieved from the left ventricle of a fresh porcine heart using MR-compatible (n = 5) and standard Cordis biopsy forceps (n = 5) were subjected to histological analysis. In the second stage, the device and workflow were tested using a developed hybrid vessel phantom, combining a human CT-based silicone aortic model and a Thiel-embalmed porcine heart. Handling performance was assessed by experienced cardiac interventionists (n = 4). Finally, in vivo testing was performed in a porcine model (n = 4), following ethics committee approval. RESULTS: Visibility of the EMB forceps was confirmed in all MRI systems and fluoroscopy. Handling was rated medium or higher by all operators. No significant difference in histological tissue quality and tissue sampling times (p > 0.05) was observed between MR-compatible and standard EMB forceps. In vivo, five tissue samples of equivalent quality were successfully harvested from six attempts, with the MR-compatible EMB forceps exhibiting smaller MRI artifact sizes in vivo compared to in vitro measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The developed preclinical testing protocol effectively evaluated key device characteristics (reliable visibility, handling, and accurate tissue sampling) of the MR-compatible EMB forceps, providing valuable insights in the early stages of in vivo trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajestani et al. (2026) studied Preclinical evaluation of MRI-guided endomyocardial biopsy. MR-compatible prototype EMB forceps vs. Standard Cordis biopsy forceps was evaluated on Histological tissue quality and tissue sampling times (p=>0.05). An MR-compatible prototype endomyocardial biopsy forceps demonstrated reliable visibility and handling, with no significant difference in tissue quality or sampling times compared to standard forceps (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: