Key result
Remote patient monitoring for chronic heart failure (N=379 patients) was well accepted by healthcare professionals, though limited human resources and scheduling constraints were key challenges.
Observational (n=379)
Yes
While remote patient monitoring for chronic heart failure is well accepted by healthcare professionals, successful implementation requires addressing significant staffing, training, and administrative challenges.
BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) involves the digital transmission and follow-up of health data. While its implementation has impacted healthcare professionals (HCPs), real-word evidence remains limited. We provide insights on the experiences, barriers and challenges faced by HCPs using RPM for chronic heart failure (CHF) management in a multisite hospital setting. METHODS: Cardio). HCPs were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to describe their experiences and perceptions of RPM implementation. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were enrolled to use RPM, most were male (61.5%) with a mean age of 75.2 years. Three HCPs (one cardiologist and two ambulatory care nurses) were interviewed. Key challenges identified were limited human resources, difficulty managing alerts due to scheduling constraints and the transition from traditional care models. The need to recruit and train dedicated RPM-specialised nurses was emphasized to support the growing volume of patients, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. Initial resistance encountered from hospital administration was reported, largely due to concerns about changing established care practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer practical first insights into the implementation of RPM for CHF. RPM was generally well accepted by HCPs in a multisite hospital setting. Addressing staffing needs and investing in training could be essential for scaling up RPM as reimbursement becomes integrated into the French healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benchimol et al. (2025) conducted an observational in chronic heart failure (n=379). Remote patient monitoring was evaluated on Experiences, barriers and challenges of RPM implementation. Remote patient monitoring for chronic heart failure (N=379 patients) was well accepted by healthcare professionals, though limited human resources and scheduling constraints were key challenges.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: