Key result
Antiembolic protection systems capture embolic debris during TAVI, highlighting their potential necessity.
Why the study?
The authors sought to discuss the necessity of antiembolic protection systems during TAVI through a clinical case.
Case Report (n=1)
This case report highlights the capture of embolic material by a cerebral protection device during TAVI, contributing to the discussion on the necessity of these systems.
Supports antiembolic protection consideration in TAVI; Level 5 evidence leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
The authors present TAVI in an 82-year-old patient. The feature was objective embolism in antiembolic protection device. The necessity of antiembolic protection systems during transcatheter aortic valve implantation is discussed. The paper suggests possible solutions, and expresses the authors' opinion. В статье представлен клинический случай транскатетерной имплантации аортального клапана у пациента 82 лет. Особенностью клинического наблюдения является объективизированная эмболия в устройство противоэмболической защиты. Обсуждается вопрос о необходимости применения систем противоэмболической защиты при транскатетерной имплантации аортального клапана. В работе предложены возможные варианты решения проблемы и высказано мнение авторов.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kavteladze et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=1). Antiembolic protection device was evaluated on Objective embolism in antiembolic protection device. An antiembolic protection device captured an objective embolism during transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an 82-year-old patient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: