Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows direct access system struggles with complaints in British Columbia, highlighting need for system efficiency.
Human rights systems in Canada face difficulties: growing caseloads, slow case processing, and a lack of access to hearings. Some Canadian jurisdictions have responded to these challenges by changing from a commission system to a direct access system. This change is made to maximize efficiency, to more quickly process complaints, and to render faster justice to all. Using British Columbia, Canada, as a test case, we assess which of these two systems is most efficient at processing complaints by examining annual reports from 1996 to 2022. We analyze which system closed complaints faster and which system screened out and or settled more cases over time. We also determined which system processed more cases in full hearings. We conclude that the commission system was more efficient, it closed more cases and was faster than the direct access system. It also provided a greater chance to have complaints adjudicated in formal hearings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arkinstall et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: