What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to clarify authorship issues between two John Aurifabers and their philosophical approaches to future contingents and divine foreknowledge.

January 24, 2026Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale

Future contingents and Divine Foreknowledge in John Aurifaber’s Questions on Aristotle’s Physics

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SMSimone Luigi Migliaro

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

This analysis evaluates the philosophical insights on future contingents and divine foreknowledge in 14th-century texts, suggesting unique authorship implications.

Key Points

The study aims to clarify authorship issues between two John Aurifabers and their philosophical approaches to future contingents and divine foreknowledge.
Philosophical and textual analysis of John Aurifaber's commentary on Aristotle's Physics
Comparison of themes and solutions in the Quaestio de eventu necessario and the Questions on the Physics
Critical edition of the two questions to support claims
Identified distinct authorship between the earlier and later John Aurifaber based on philosophical solutions
Demonstrated innovative approaches to divine foreknowledge and future contingents in the later Aurifaber's work
Proposed a compatibilist perspective that diverges from contemporary views in the late medieval period

Cite This Study

Simone Luigi Migliaro (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746187bb9d90c67120b60f https://doi.org/10.1484/j.bpm.5.151713

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

January 24, 2026Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale

Future contingents and Divine Foreknowledge in John Aurifaber’s Questions on Aristotle’s Physics

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SMSimone Luigi Migliaro

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

This analysis evaluates the philosophical insights on future contingents and divine foreknowledge in 14th-century texts, suggesting unique authorship implications.

Key Points

The study aims to clarify authorship issues between two John Aurifabers and their philosophical approaches to future contingents and divine foreknowledge.
Philosophical and textual analysis of John Aurifaber's commentary on Aristotle's Physics
Comparison of themes and solutions in the Quaestio de eventu necessario and the Questions on the Physics
Critical edition of the two questions to support claims
Identified distinct authorship between the earlier and later John Aurifaber based on philosophical solutions
Demonstrated innovative approaches to divine foreknowledge and future contingents in the later Aurifaber's work
Proposed a compatibilist perspective that diverges from contemporary views in the late medieval period

Cite This Study

Simone Luigi Migliaro (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746187bb9d90c67120b60f https://doi.org/10.1484/j.bpm.5.151713

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark