Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan reduces HFH vs valsartan in patients with EF below 57%.
Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction lacks effective therapies, raising the hypothesis that sacubitril-valsartan would reduce HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death.
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization compared to valsartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥45%)?
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization compared to valsartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥45%)?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce the primary composite outcome in the overall HFpEF population, but may offer benefit in patients with LVEF below 57% (HFmrEF).
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical condition characterized by large pathophysiology heterogeneity with lack of effective therapies as proven by the disappointing results generated by randomized controlled trials. The innovative therapeutic concept provided by sacubitril–valsartan, a molecule combining angiotensin receptor blocking agent and neprilysin inhibitor has suggested the hypothesis it would have led to a reduced risk of hospitalization for HF or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction. The PARAGON-HF (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920711) investigated HF subjects class II to IV HF, ejection fraction of 45% or higher, elevated level of natriuretic peptides, and structural heart disease to receive sacubitril–valsartan (target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or valsartan (target dose, 160 mg twice daily). The trial missed the primary outcome of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization (HFH) in the overall study population. A subgroup analysis addressed significant decrease of HFH in subjects with left ventricular ejection fraction below the median 57% value in the study. The data were consistent with previous post hoc analysis performed in studies where candesartan and spironolactone were investigated in HFpEF. Those results open the door to investigate angiotensin aldosterone and peptidases inhibition efficacy in the unexplored HF middle range ejection fraction, currently lacking of valid evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gronda et al. (2020) studied this question. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced heart failure hospitalizations in patients with ejection fraction below the median of 57% in the PARAGON-HF trial.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: