Qualitative analysis reveals expert intuition impacts incident response outcomes under pressure, suggesting training improvements.
The intuition of incident responders often determines whether organizations withstand cyberattacks, especially under ambiguity and time pressure. Drawing on Naturalistic Decision Making, we examine how intuition interacts with analytic reasoning, tools, and procedures in incident response, based on 23 interviews with experienced responders. We found that intuition is particularly critical during incident triage and analysis, where uncertainty is highest. Responders construct provisional storylines from sparse cues to cope with this uncertainty. They thereby rely on schema matching (e.g., matches a DDoS) and mismatching (e.g., deviates from expected behavior), triggering mental simulation and serial evaluation of responses. Time pressure forces them to adopt a satisficing strategy – gathering just enough evidence to initiate containment and buy time for deeper analysis. Our findings highlight the limitations of technological and formalized approaches, underscoring the critical importance of practitioners' expertise. These limitations can be mitigated by integrating expert schemas into training and decision support tools. ICIS 2025 Proceedings > Cybersecurity and Privacy > 5
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaltegger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: