Key result
Cardiac CT detects LAA peri-device leaks in ~6% of patients, localizing primarily to the posterior-inferior ostium.
Why the study?
Real-world data on CT-based peri-device leak localization after WATCHMAN implantation are limited, and standardized methods to describe leak distribution are lacking.
What is the spatial distribution of peri-device leaks on gated cardiac CT at first follow-up in patients post-WATCHMAN implantation?
Cohort (n=676)
Yes
What is the spatial distribution of peri-device leaks on gated cardiac CT at first follow-up in patients post-WATCHMAN implantation?
Cardiac CT with clock-face mapping reveals that larger peri-device leaks post-WATCHMAN implantation predominantly occur in the posterior-inferior region, providing a reproducible framework for spatial assessment.
CT mapping of post-WATCHMAN PDLs reveals predominant posterior-inferior sites; leaves open whether targeted positioning alters outcomes.
Background The WATCHMAN device requires post-implant imaging to assess peri-device leak (PDL) and device-related thrombus, typically with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Cardiac CT has emerged as a non-invasive alternative, offering high-resolution views of left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy. However, real-world data on CT-based leak localization are limited, and standardized methods to describe leak distribution are lacking. Purpose To evaluate the spatial distribution of PDLs using gated cardiac CT at first follow-up post-WATCHMAN implantation and to apply a reproducible clock-face framework for anatomical mapping. Methods Patients undergoing WATCHMAN FLX or FLX Pro implantation were enrolled in a prospective multicenter registry and followed per local standard of care. Gated cardiac CT was performed first follow up (45-90 days) and interpreted by a central imaging core laboratory. PDLs were defined as contrast opacification within the LAA and categorized by minimum width: <3 mm or ≥3 mm. Leak locations were mapped using a 12-point clock-face centered on the LAA ostium, with 12:00 representing anterior and 6:00 posterior, following standard axial CT orientation. Results Among 676 patients with post-implant CT imaging, 41 (6.1%) had core lab–adjudicated PDLs with defined anatomical location and size. A total of 42 leaks were recorded, including one patient with two distinct sites. Among 30 patients with leaks ≥3 mm, 7:00 was the most common site (9/30; 30%), followed by 6:00, 8:00, and 11:00 (each 4/30; 13.3%). Among 11 patients with leaks <3 mm, the most frequent sites were 1:00 (4/11; 36.4%) and 11:00 (4/11; 36.4%), followed by 12:00 and 2:00. Leaks were less frequently observed at lateral positions (3:00 and 9:00). (Figure) Conclusion At first follow-up, CT-identified peri-device leaks were most frequently located in the posterior-inferior region of the LAA ostium, particularly for larger leaks. Smaller leaks tended to occur more anteriorly. Clock-face mapping offers a reproducible and intuitive framework for spatial assessment of PDLs and may improve procedural planning, cross-modality comparisons, and device refinement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motairek et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Post-WATCHMAN implantation (n=676). WATCHMAN FLX or FLX Pro implantation was evaluated on Presence and spatial distribution of peri-device leaks (PDLs) on gated cardiac CT. At 45-90 days post-WATCHMAN implantation, cardiac CT identified peri-device leaks in 6.1% of patients, with larger leaks (≥3 mm) most frequently located in the posterior-inferior region.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: