This article introduces an identity-based policy framework that addresses structural inequalities by centering social identities in diverse societies.
Traditional public policy, which is based on the assumption of citizen homogeneity, has often failed to address deep-seated structural inequalities. This article introduces the emerging paradigm of “identity-based policymaking” as an alternative framework that enables the transition from simplistic and uniform models to accountable and equitable governance in diverse and fragmented societies. By integrating theoretical foundations including social identity theory, the social construction of target populations, and the intersectionality framework, this framework places social identities at the center of policy analysis, design, and evaluation. By presenting the identity-instrument fit matrix as a prescriptive model and utilizing the latent class analysis method to scientifically identify latent target groups, the article argues that the effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of a policy depend on the alignment of its instrument logic with the dominant identity logic in the target population. Empirical evidence from various fields such as the environment, health, and agriculture proves the practical superiority of this approach compared to traditional models and its ability to achieve substantive justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khosravi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: