Key result
MR-guided SBRT undergoes Phase II evaluation for safety and feasibility in patients with cardiac malignancies.
Why the study?
Data on stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary or secondary cardiac malignancies have been limited to case reports or small retrospective studies.
Does MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) provide a safe and feasible treatment for patients with inoperable primary or secondary cardiac malignancies?
Phase II
Yes
Does MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) provide a safe and feasible treatment for patients with inoperable primary or secondary cardiac malignancies?
The SHARP trial protocol outlines a prospective multicenter phase II study to systematically evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for rare, inoperable cardiac malignancies.
Background Cardiac tumors are exceedingly rare with metastatic involvement representing the most frequent form of malignancy within the heart. In patients presenting with inoperable primary or recurrent malignant cardiac sarcomas or cardiac/epicardial/pericardial metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) serves as an alternative local treatment to surgery or may, in some cases, constitute the sole viable local treatment modality. To date, there are only case reports or small retrospective studies assessing SBRT dose and toxicity for cardiac SBRT. The goal of this prospective multicentric observational study is to systematically evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and outcome of magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) in the management of primary and secondary cardiac malignancies. Methods The treatment is performed using MR-guided SBRT in five fractions on non-consecutive days (6–8 Gy per fraction prescribed to the 80% isodose). Four study centers participate in this prospective phase II trial (Heidelberg, Munich, Rome, Zurich). Eligible patients who consent to participate in the study will undergo treatment as indicated and approved by an interdisciplinary tumor board. Primary objective is to assess the feasibility and safety of online adaptive MRgSBRT; secondary endpoints are local control and survival outcome, acute and late toxicity, patient-reported outcome as well as technical feasibility of treatment. Discussion The findings from this study may serve as a foundation for the future integration of cardiac SBRT into clinical practice guidelines for the management of cardiac malignancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaasch et al. (2026) conducted a phase ii in malignant cardiac sarcomas or cardiac/pericardial metastases. MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) vs. null was evaluated on Occurrence of acute toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 within 3 months after RT initiation, treatment discontinuation, mortality within 3 months after RT start..
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: