Key result
Operator-directed nurse-administered propofol and remifentanil ensures safe and effective sedation for AF ablation.
Why the study?
Adequate sedation and analgesia are essential for AF ablation, but cardiac anaesthesiology availability is limited, necessitating evaluation of operator-directed, nurse-administered sedation protocols.
Does an operator-directed, nurse-administered sedation protocol using propofol and remifentanil provide safe and effective sedation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=230)
No
Does an operator-directed, nurse-administered sedation protocol using propofol and remifentanil provide safe and effective sedation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
An operator-directed, nurse-administered sedation protocol using propofol and remifentanil is safe and effective for atrial fibrillation ablation, offering a viable alternative when cardiac anesthesiology resources are limited.
Supports nurse-administered propofol-remifentanil sedation for AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
AIMS: Adequate sedation and analgesia are essential for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to ensure patient comfort and procedural safety. However, the availability of cardiac anaesthesiology is limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an operator-directed, nurse-administered (ODNA) sedation protocol using propofol and remifentanil during AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, single-centre observational cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF from August 2023 to March 2024 were enrolled. Sedation-related adverse events and intra-procedural vital signs were recorded. Sedation depth was assessed using the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale, and patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A total of 230 patients were included (mean age 61.9 years; 76.1% male). Of these, 7.4% had a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2, and 4.3% had obstructive sleep apnoea. Paroxysmal AF accounted for 30.9%, and the mean procedure time was 174 min. The primary outcome-defined as unplanned sedation interruption, intubation, or continuous vasopressor requirement-occurred in 2.2% of patients. Intermittent hypotension (mean arterial pressure: <60 mmHg) occurred in 36.1% of patients, but no patient required continuous vasopressors. The mean MOAA/S score was 0.4 ± 0.4. Post-procedural surveys showed high satisfaction (mean VAS: 8.8) and low maximal pain (VAS: 0.9). CONCLUSION: An ODNA protocol using propofol and remifentanil provides effective and safe sedation for AF ablation, with high patient satisfaction and minimal serious adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=230). Operator-directed, nurse-administered (ODNA) sedation protocol using propofol and remifentanil was evaluated on Unplanned sedation interruption, intubation, or continuous vasopressor requirement. An operator-directed, nurse-administered sedation protocol during AF ablation resulted in a 2.2% rate of unplanned sedation interruption, intubation, or continuous vasopressor requirement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: