Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation of bacterial and enzymatic treatments affecting antioxidant activity in tropical bee pollen, suggesting functional food potential.
This study evaluated the effects of bacterial fermentation (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, CHOOZIT®, and YO-MIX®) and enzymatic hydrolysis (Protamex® and Neutrase® at 1% w/w and 5% w/w) on the proximate composition and antioxidant activity of bee pollen from the Colombian tropical dry forest. Both treatments significantly modified the nutritional profile, increasing moisture content (48–71% fermented; 50–68% hydrolyzed) while reducing protein and carbohydrate fractions. Fermentation produced strain-dependent antioxidant effects: L. plantarum maximized ABTS scavenging, while YO-MIX® 1:1 achieved the highest DPPH activity. Enzymatic hydrolysis demonstrated superior and more consistent improvements across all assays: Neutrase® 1% achieved 8.5-fold ABTS enhancement, while Protamex® 1% maximized DPPH scavenging (8-fold). All enzymatic treatments increased total phenolic content by 70–84%. Protamex® 1% emerged as the optimal treatment, achieving the highest DPPH activity (2689 µM Trolox equivalents/g pollen), substantial antioxidant enhancement across all assays, and preserved nutritional stability (201 kcal/100 g). These findings support the use of mild enzymatic hydrolysis for valorizing Colombian tropical bee pollen as a functional food ingredient with enhanced bioavailability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Villareal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: