PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Educational Technology Research and Development3 citationsOpen Access

Cheating in the second year of generative AI chatbots: a follow-up study on high school student cheating behaviors

View Full Paper
RCRuishi ChenVLVictor R. LeeAKAnnie Camey Kuo

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the relationship between AI chatbots and academic integrity among high school students.
  • Conducted a comprehensive survey across six high schools in the United States.
  • Collected self-reported data from 4,354 students regarding cheating behaviors and AI usage patterns.
  • Analyzed student perspectives on appropriate AI use for academic tasks.
  • Overall cheating rates among students remained stable at 72.06% over time.
  • Increased usage of AI chatbots reported for tasks like concept explanation and idea generation.
  • Students supported using AI for conceptual understanding while opposing its use for completing entire assignments.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the evolving relationship between AI chatbots and academic integrity and students’ AI chatbot usage in high schools one and a half years after the release of ChatGPT. Through a comprehensive survey of students across six schools (N = 4,354) in the United States, we investigated students' self-reported cheating behaviors, patterns of AI use across different school-related tasks, and student perspectives on appropriate AI use in academic settings. Our findings revealed that overall cheating rates remain stable at 72.06%, consistent with historical baselines and prior studies, suggesting that AI availability has not changed overall cheating prevalence in high school. Additionally, more students reported using AI chatbots for support tasks like concept explanation and idea generation. Regarding students' reported preferences for allowing AI chatbots for school-related tasks, at this point, they still strongly supported using AI for conceptual understanding and brainstorming, and they maintained clear boundaries against using it for completing entire assignments. These findings suggest that while AI’s prevalence has not altered the patterns of academic integrity at schools, students' evolving perspectives on appropriate AI use provide valuable insights for schools and administrators integrating AI into traditional school settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698435d5f1d9ada3c1fb513fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10587-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study of cheating behaviors before and after the release of ChatGPT2024 · 126 citations
  2. 2ChatGPT Goes to College: Exploring Student Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom2024 · 24 citations
  3. 3ChatGPT Use and Abuse: A 3 Year Look at Undergraduate Perceptions and Usage in the Classroom2026
  4. 4Ethics in Times of Advanced AI: Investigating Students’ Attitudes Towards ChatGPT and Academic Integrity2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Beyond CheatBots: Examining Tensions in Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Cheating and Learning with ChatGPT2024 · 39 citations