Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates the effectiveness of different learning modes on holistic development in university students, suggesting the need for interpersonal engagement.
Purpose: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the online and face-to-face formats of a course-based Positive Youth Development (PYD) program, “Tomorrow's Leaders,” in promoting holistic development among university students in Hong Kong. Method: Utilizing a one-group pretest-posttest design, this study collected data from students who took the course “Tomorrow's Leaders” before and after the course, with 2,695 students enrolled online and 4,056 students enrolled face-to-face. Results: Students demonstrated enhanced PYD attributes, psychological well-being, and desired graduate qualities in both formats. Students in the face-to-face format showed greater improvement than those in online format in specific outcomes (e.g., self-determination, life satisfaction, and problem-solving ability). Discussion: The findings supported the effectiveness of the online PYD program but also highlighted the advantages of face-to-face learning. This disparity underscores the critical role of interpersonal engagement in nurturing leadership abilities and fostering a positive self-concept in young people, which is relevant to youth social workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: