Key result
Each 1-point KCCQ-12 increase is linked to ~2% lower all-cause mortality in HF patients.
Why the study?
The exact role of patient-related factors and comorbidities as determinants of QoL in HF patients remains incompletely elucidated, as does the association between QoL and mortality.
What factors are independently associated with quality of life (KCCQ-12) in patients with heart failure, and does KCCQ-12 predict all-cause mortality?
Observational (n=1,397)
Yes
What factors are independently associated with quality of life (KCCQ-12) in patients with heart failure, and does KCCQ-12 predict all-cause mortality?
Hazard Ratio: 0.976 (95% CI 0.97–0.981)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with heart failure, quality of life is influenced by various cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities and is a significant predictor of all-cause mortality.
KCCQ-12 score was associated with lower mortality in HF; extends prior observational data but leaves causal impact and practice change open.
Background Novel therapies for heart failure (HF) are introduced not only to prevent clinical events but also to improve patients' quality of life (QoL). HF patients often present with multiple non-cardiac comorbidities, which may impact their prognosis and patient-reported outcomes. Despite the widespread use of QoL assessments in this group — both in clinical practice and clinical trials — the exact role of patient-related factors as determinants of QoL remains not fully elucidated. Purpose This study aims to assess the impact of comorbidities and other patient-related factors on QoL in HF patients, as well as the association between QoL and mortality in this group. Methods This study is part of a prospective, observational, national registry - HEart failuRe ObsErvational Study of the Polish Cardiac Society (HEROES). Patients with HF were enrolled in 41 Polish centers and the only exclusion criterion was age < 18 years old. QoL was assessed at baseline with a KCCQ-12 overall score. Follow-up data on all-cause mortality was obtained from the Polish Ministry of Digital Affairs. Adjusted linear regression with backward elimination method was used to identify factors associated with KCCQ-12. Results The study included 1397 patients with available KCCQ-12 overall score [median = 47.92 (28.65 – 72.92)]. Patients hospitalized for HF had similar values of KCCQ-12 overall score compared to non-cardiac hospitalizations [36 (21-57) vs 39 (10-60), p=0.942] and higher KCCQ-12 scores than patients hospitalized for other cardiac results [53 (38-78), p<0.001]. Patients with higher NYHA class had consistently significantly lower values of all KCCQ-12 domains and KCCQ-12 overall score [85 (69-93) vs 65 (46-79) vs 35 (23-49) vs 21 (10-38), all p<0.001]. Adjusted linear regression revealed that visit type, hepatic dysfunction, body mass index, gender, chronic kidney disease, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device, atrial fibrillation, stroke, asthma, anemia and age were independently associated with KCCQ-12 (Figure 1). KCCQ-12 was also significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR per 1 point increase =0.976, 95%CI:0.970-0.981, p<0.001) (Figure 2). The AUC for KCCQ-12 overall score to predict mortality at the follow-up period was 0.680 (95%CI:0.642-0.717, p<0.001). Conclusions Both cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities, as well as visit type, age and body mass index, are independently associated with QoL in patients with HF. Future studies incorporating QoL assessment in HF patients should be interpreted with particular consideration of these factors.Adjusted linear regression for KCCQ-12 Kaplan-Meier curves for mortality
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bednarek et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=1,397). KCCQ-12 overall score was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.976, 95% CI 0.970-0.981, p=<0.001). Higher quality of life, measured by the KCCQ-12 overall score, was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure (HR 0.976 per 1-point increase; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: