Key result
CRT-P implantation linked to ~14-point improvement in MLHFQ quality of life scores.
Why the study?
Factors associated with clinically important changes in quality of life among real-world heart failure patients needed to be identified.
Cohort (n=419)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a real-world heart failure cohort, CRT-P implantation was associated with improved quality of life, whereas advanced NYHA class and recent hospitalizations drove significant QoL deterioration.
Background/Objectives: We aimed to identify the factors associated with clinically important changes in quality of life (QoL) of real-world heart failure (HF) patients. Methods: This is a single-centre, prospective cohort study including 419 patients at an HF clinic between January 2013 and February 2020. QoL was assessed regularly using Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). We used five nested linear mixed-effects models to account for QoL measurements between patients and within-patient. Models were adjusted for time, sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, self-care adherence, and HF severity factors. Results: Median age was 78 years, 54.4% of patients were female, and 49.6% had left ventricle ejection fraction ≥ 50%. At baseline, 62.5% of patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II. Median N-terminal-pro-B type natriuretic peptide level was 1454 pg/mL. Mean MLHFQ total score at baseline was 25 points (95%CI: 22.97–27.60). Having an implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker (CRT-P) was associated with moderate to large improvement in QoL (−13.55 points, 95%CI: −22.45–−4.65). NYHA class II and estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were associated with small to moderate QoL deterioration (9.74 points, 95%CI: 6.74–12.75 and 5.82 points, 95%CI: 1.17–10.47, respectively). NYHA classes III or IV and a recent HF hospitalization were associated with large to very large QoL deterioration (28.39 points, 95%CI: 23.82–32.96; 60.59 points, 95%CI: 34.46–86.72; and 26.91 points, 95%CI: 21.80–32.03, respectively). Conclusions: CRT-P implantation, NYHA class and HF hospitalization are associated with the most clinically important QoL changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marques et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=419). Clinical factors (CRT-P implantation, NYHA class, HF hospitalization) was evaluated on Changes in quality of life assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (Score change -13.55, 95% CI -22.45--4.65). CRT-P implantation was associated with improved quality of life, whereas higher functional class and recent heart failure hospitalization caused large deterioration.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: