Key result
Fast VT scar mapping identifies all functional isthmuses, uncovering substrates missed by SR in ~81%.
Why the study?
Mapping and ablating monomorphic fast ventricular tachycardias is challenging due to hemodynamic instability, and defining functional boundaries of isthmuses may improve ablation outcomes.
Does ultrahigh-density voltage mapping during fast ventricular tachycardia compared to sinus rhythm improve the identification of functional isthmuses in a swine model of myocardial infarction?
Does ultrahigh-density voltage mapping during fast ventricular tachycardia compared to sinus rhythm improve the identification of functional isthmuses in a swine model of myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.51% vs 0.11%
p-value: p=<0.001
Scar voltage heterogeneity mapping during fast ventricular tachycardia allows for precise delineation of functional isthmus borders compared to sinus rhythm, potentially optimizing ablation strategies.
May aid isthmus mapping in experimental fast VT; hypothesis-generating in swine, clinical validation required.
Background Mapping and ablating monomorphic fast ventricular tachycardias (FVT) with a cycle length <320 ms remains challenging due to hemodynamic instability. Identifying arrhythmogenic substrates during sinus rhythm (SR) is further complicated by rate-dependent functional properties of heterogeneous tissue (HT). Defining the functional boundaries of FVT isthmuses (FVTI) may enhance ablation outcomes. Methods We conducted an experimental study in 30 Large-White swine with anterior myocardial infarction. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed for signal intensity (SI) mapping, followed by ultrahigh-density voltage mapping and electrophysiological studies at 4- and 16-weeks post-infarction. FVTIs were identified as corridors of high frequency electrograms spanning the electric diastole in reentrant propagation maps. Voltage heterogeneity maps during both FVT and SR (0.1-1.5 mV) were compared to assess the presence of functional substrates. Results A total of 60 ventricular tachycardias were induced, with 27 classified as FVTs and mapped entirely. Among these, 25 demonstrated reentrant activation, allowing FVTI identification. All FVTI colocalized with SI-defined channels and voltage channels in FVT maps. Key findings from the voltage comparison between FVT and SR included: (1) an increased dense scar area (<0.1 mV) in FVT maps compared to SR (1.51 vs. 0.11 cm², p<0.001); (2) longer voltage channels sustaining FVTI during FVT compared to SR (18.7 vs. 14.6 mm, p=0.047); and (3) functional substrates detected in 81% of FVTIs, as evidenced by the presence of voltage channels bordered by dense scar in FVT maps, a feature observed in only four SR channels. Adjusting the lower voltage limit in SR voltage maps enabled retrospective identification of 88% of FVTIs. Conclusions Scar voltage heterogeneity mapping during FVT successfully identified all FVTI. The comparative analysis of voltage heterogeneity in FVT and SR allowed for precise delineation of functional isthmus borders, offering valuable insights into ventricular tachycardia substrate characterization that may lead the way to optimized ablation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergaz et al. (2025) studied anterior myocardial infarction (n=30). Voltage mapping during fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT) vs. Voltage mapping during sinus rhythm (SR) was evaluated on Dense scar area (<0.1 mV) (p=<0.001). Voltage mapping during fast ventricular tachycardia revealed an increased dense scar area compared to sinus rhythm (1.51 vs. 0.11 cm², p<0.001) and successfully identified all functional isthmuses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: