Key result
Heart transplant for Chagas disease shows similar in-hospital mortality but higher costs versus non-Chagas patients.
Why the study?
Heart transplantation in end-stage Chagas cardiomyopathy remains controversial, with limited evidence on post-transplant outcomes in non-endemic regions such as the United States.
Does Chagas disease affect in-hospital mortality and acute clinical outcomes in heart transplant recipients in the United States?
Observational (n=16,442)
Yes
Does Chagas disease affect in-hospital mortality and acute clinical outcomes in heart transplant recipients in the United States?
Heart transplantation in patients with Chagas disease in the US has similar acute in-hospital mortality and graft outcomes compared to non-Chagas patients, supporting its feasibility in non-endemic regions despite higher costs and post-discharge care needs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similar in-hospital mortality supports HT feasibility in Chagas cardiomyopathy; observational data leave long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness open.
Background Chagas disease (CD), a neglected disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a leading cause of cardiomyopathy in endemic countries and increasingly recognized in non-endemic countries like the United States. Heart transplantation (HT) is a life-saving measure in patients with end-stage Chagas cardiomyopathy. However, there has been controversy regarding the use of HT on these patients and there is unfortunately limited evidence regarding post-HT outcomes in patients with end-stage CD in non-endemic regions. Purpose We aim to assess the clinical profile and acute clinical outcomes of HT patients with CD compared to those without CD in the US. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2021 to compare the baseline characteristics and hospital outcomes of 16,442 estimated HT admissions, including 116 with end-stage CD. Survey weights, strata, and clustering were incorporated using the survey package in R to generate nationally representative estimates Results We found no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.879) and clinical outcomes, including primary graft failure (17.4% vs. 13.6%; p=0.595), or acute rejection (4.3% vs. 3.2%; p=0.749), in CD recipients. However, CD patients had higher healthcare-associated costs ($1,292,810 ± $798,757 vs. $1,143,960 ± $1,042,981, p=0.029) and required home health care more frequently upon discharge (63.6% vs 39.4%, p<0.001). Conclusions These findings supports HT’s feasibility in CD in non-endemic countries, underscoring the relevance of specialized management of this population these settings. Further studies assessing long-term outcomes in these contexts are required.Figure 1.Temporal trends in CD HT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochoa et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart transplantation (n=16,442). Chagas disease vs. Without Chagas disease was evaluated on in-hospital mortality (p=0.879). Heart transplant recipients with Chagas disease had similar in-hospital mortality compared to those without the disease (4.3% vs. 5.0%; p=0.879), but incurred higher healthcare-associated costs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: