Key result
High Lp(a) linked to non-calcified plaques in CAC-zero patients, whereas ApoB/ApoA1 shows no association.
Why the study?
A zero CAC score indicates low cardiovascular risk but does not exclude CAD, and traditional lipid markers may not capture risk in these patients.
Do advanced lipid markers like Lp(a) predict the presence of non-calcified plaques in patients with a zero CAC score?
Population
434 low-risk patients undergoing coronary CCTA
Comparison
Lipid profiles in patients with CAC score = 0 vs CAC score ≥1
Design
Single-center prospective registry study
Authors
Loading...
High Lp(a) may flag occult plaque in CAC-zero patients; leaves open whether testing refines stratification or outcomes.
Observational (n=434)
No
Do advanced lipid markers like Lp(a) predict the presence of non-calcified plaques in patients with a zero CAC score?
Effect estimate: OR 2.173 (95% CI 0.164-28.774)
p-value: p=0.556
Elevated Lp(a) levels (>126 mg/dl) are associated with the presence of non-calcified plaques >25% stenosis in patients with a zero CAC score, suggesting a role for advanced lipid testing to refine primary prevention in this population.
Alsubai et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease in low-risk patients (n=434). Lipid profile assessment (Lp(a), ApoB/ApoA1 ratio) vs. Patients with CAC score ≥1 was evaluated on Association of ApoB/ApoA1 ratio with non-calcified plaques >25% stenosis in CAC-zero patients (OR 2.173, 95% CI 0.164-28.774, p=0.556). In patients with a zero calcium score, Lp(a) levels >126 mg/dl were significantly associated with non-calcified plaques >25% stenosis (p=0.009), whereas the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was not (OR 2.173).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: