Key result
SBP variability independently predicts in-hospital and long-term outcomes in AMI patients.
Why the study?
The prognostic role of short-term and mid-term blood pressure variability in acute myocardial infarction remains unknown.
Does higher blood pressure variability predict adverse in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=441)
No
Does higher blood pressure variability predict adverse in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Systolic blood pressure variability is an independent predictor of both in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction, suggesting its potential utility for post-MI risk stratification.
INTRODUCTION: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a prognostic marker in hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD), but its role in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unknown. This study assessed the association of short-term (24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, ABPM) and mid-term BPV with adverse in-hospital and long-term outcomes in AMI patients. METHODS: Mid-term BPV was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of daily in-hospital BP readings; short-term BPV was measured by average real variability (ARV) from ABPM. Patients were evaluated as continuous variables and by quartiles (Q1-Q4). Logistic regression and Cox models assessed in-hospital and 3-year outcomes. RESULTS: In this prospective, single-center cohort, 441 of 677 AMI patients were included. Each 1 mmHg rise in day-to-day systolic BPV (SBP-SD) increased in-hospital MACE risk by 24% [odds ratio (OR): 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-1.31], with Q4 showing the highest risk (OR: 28.89, 95% CI: 8.58-97.28). ABPM-derived SBP-ARV predicted in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.21-2.07) and MACE (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.23-1.48). Diastolic ARV was linked to in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmias, and shock. At 3-year follow up, Q4 of SBP-SD showed higher risk of composite outcomes (hazard ratio: 29.88, 95% CI: 10.93-81.66) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 11.85, 95% CI: 2.81-49.91). SBP-ARV independently predicted both all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25-1.51) and adverse events (hazard ratio: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.22-1.36), while diastolic BPV was primarily associated with arrhythmias and heart failure hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Systolic BPV independently predicts in-hospital and long-term outcomes in AMI. BPV assessment may aid post-MI risk stratification and guide novel therapeutic strategies in this high-risk population.
Konstantinou et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=441). Systolic blood pressure variability vs. Lower blood pressure variability was evaluated on in-hospital MACE (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.31). Higher day-to-day systolic blood pressure variability increased the risk of in-hospital MACE (OR 1.24 per 1 mmHg rise; 95% CI 1.17-1.31) and 3-year composite outcomes in AMI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: