Key result
Inclisiran monotherapy lowers LDL-C ~48% vs. placebo in Chinese adults with hypercholesterolemia.
Why the study?
Does inclisiran monotherapy reduce LDL-C in Chinese adults with low or moderate ASCVD risk and elevated LDL-C who are not on lipid-lowering therapy?
RCT (n=207)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does inclisiran monotherapy reduce LDL-C in Chinese adults with low or moderate ASCVD risk and elevated LDL-C who are not on lipid-lowering therapy?
Mean Difference: -47.5 (95% CI -52.35–-42.65)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Inclisiran monotherapy significantly reduces LDL-C and other atherogenic lipids in Chinese adults with low to moderate ASCVD risk, with a favorable safety profile.
Background Cumulative exposure to LDL-C increases the risk of ASCVD events. Despite available treatments, many Chinese patients at risk of ASCVD fail to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals, often due to poor adherence and/or tolerability to lipid-lowering therapies. Twice-yearly (after initial and 3-month doses) inclisiran, an siRNA targeting PCSK9, provides effective and sustained LDL-C reduction when combined with statins and/or other lipid-lowering therapies. VICTORION-Mono China is the first study to evaluate inclisiran as monotherapy in a Chinese population. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inclisiran as monotherapy in Chinese adults with low/moderate ASCVD risk and elevated LDL-C who are not on lipid-lowering therapy. Methods This Phase 3, multi-centre, two-part randomised trial included a double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month treatment period and 6-month open-label period. Chinese patients aged 18–75 years, with low/moderate ASCVD risk as per Chinese guidelines, fasting LDL-C ≥130 to <190 mg/dL at screening, and not on lipid-lowering therapy, were randomised 1:1 to receive inclisiran sodium 300 mg (inclisiran 284 mg) or placebo. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of inclisiran versus placebo on the mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 150. Secondary objectives included absolute change in LDL-C and percentage change in other atherogenic lipids and PCSK9 at Day 150; percentage change in LDL-C at Day 330; and safety and tolerability of inclisiran. Results Overall, 207 participants were randomised to receive either inclisiran (n=103) or placebo (n=104). Mean age was 47.9 years, 58.5% were female, and mean baseline LDL-C was 149.9 mg/dL (Table). Overall, 167 patients (80.7%) had low and 37 (17.9%) had moderate ASCVD risk. Inclisiran treatment met the primary endpoint: mean placebo-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C was –47.50% (95% CI: −52.35, −42.65, p<0.0001) from baseline to Day 150. The LDL-C reduction was evident at Day 30 and was sustained through Day 360 (Figure). Absolute placebo-adjusted LDL-C change at Day 150 was −69.73 mg/dL (95% CI: −76.60, −62.86; p<0.0001). Inclisiran also lowered PCSK9 (−77.83%), total cholesterol (−31.49%), non-HDL-C (−40.57%), and apoB (−36.84%) at Day 150 (all p<0.0001). At Day 330, the mean percentage change in LDL-C was −45.45% (95% CI: −48.57, −42.34) for the inclisiran group. In the double-blinded part, adverse event rates in the inclisiran and placebo groups were similar at 70.9% (73/103) and 67.3% (70/104), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the inclisiran (13.6%) than in the placebo (3.8%) group, but none were serious. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion Inclisiran monotherapy was well-tolerated and resulted in sustained and effective reductions in LDL-C and other pro-atherogenic lipids in Chinese patients, establishing it as a potentially useful treatment option for patients at risk of ASCVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Low or moderate ASCVD risk and elevated LDL-C (n=207). Inclisiran vs. Placebo was evaluated on Mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 150 (MD -47.50%, 95% CI -52.35 to -42.65, p=<0.0001). Inclisiran monotherapy significantly reduced LDL-C by a placebo-adjusted mean of 47.5% (95% CI -52.35 to -42.65; P<0.0001) at Day 150 in Chinese adults with elevated LDL-C.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: