Key result
Native T1 mapping showed women with severe AS had higher AV fibrosis (T1 1910 vs 1815 ms, p=0.042) and lower CCT calcium scores than men (512 vs 1351, p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Little work has explored the role of CMR for evaluating aortic valve tissue characteristics, including using T1 mapping to assess valve fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis.
Does CMR native T1 mapping of the aortic valve identify fibrosis-predominant severe aortic stenosis compared to CCT calcium scoring?
Does CMR native T1 mapping of the aortic valve identify fibrosis-predominant severe aortic stenosis compared to CCT calcium scoring?
CMR native T1 mapping of the aortic valve may be a useful adjunct to identify fibrosis-predominant severe aortic stenosis, particularly in women who typically present with lower calcium burdens.
Native T1 mapping may identify fibrosis-predominant severe AS in women; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. AS develops due to a combination of valve calcification and fibrosis. There are clear sex differences in the proportion of calcification and fibrosis that occurs, with females generally developing more significant AV fibrosis, and males developing more AV calcification. While the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is well established for the assessment of myocardial response to AS, there has been little work exploring the role of CMR for evaluation of the aortic valve (AV) tissue characteristics. While transthoracic echocardiography is the mainstay imaging modality for assessing AS, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and CMR can be useful adjuncts. This exploratory work investigates the role of CMR in AS assessment, using T1 mapping to assess the degree of AV fibrosis in patients with severe AS and healthy controls, and compares CMR assessment to CCT. The CMR protocol included cardiac cine imaging. T1 mapping of the AV was then performed using the same slice used for AVA planimetry. CMR analysis was performed using cvi42 (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Canada). Some patients with severe AS underwent CCT imaging: CCT analysis of AV calcium scores were performed using 3mensio software©1. 202 patients with severe AS (34% females, 76[68,80] years) and 21 healthy controls (43% female, 68[61,71] years) were recruited to the study. Women and men with severe AS were age- and co-morbidity matched, and healthy controls were age-matched. There was no significant difference in AV peak velocity (Vmax) in the two AS cohorts on echocardiographic assessment (4.6 [4,5,4.7] m/sec). CCT was performed in 133 (66%) of the patients with severe AS, and women with severe AS had significantly lower CCT AV calcium scores compared to men with severe AS (512[340,750] vs 1351[799,1770];p<0.0001) (figure 1). Forty-seven of the patients with severe AS (23%) had native T1 mapping of the AV, and showed that women with severe AS had significantly higher mean native T1 values compared to men with severe AS (1910[1827,1993] vs 1815[1768,1860];p=0.042). Assessing all patients with severe AS, there was a moderate inverse correlation between CCT calcium score and native T1 mapping of the AV (r=-0.50, p=0.0014) (figure 2). There was no significant difference in AV native T1 values comparing both sexes with severe AS to their sex-matched controls (women with AS 1910[1827,1993] vs 1947[1926,2001];p=0.47. Men with AS 1815[1768,1860] vs 1840[1779,1901];p=0.60). Patients who have fibrosis-predominant AS cannot easily be detected with CCT. This work has indicated the potential role of native T1 mapping of the AV, to identify patients with severe AS without a high calcium burden. T1 mapping may prove useful in the detection of fibrosis-predominant AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Procter et al. (2025) studied this question. Native T1 mapping showed women with severe AS had higher AV fibrosis (T1 1910 vs 1815 ms, p=0.042) and lower CCT calcium scores than men (512 vs 1351, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: