Key result
Sarcomeric HCM shows ~2.6-fold more fibrosis, greater myocardial disarray, and worse oxygenation than non-sarcomeric HCM.
Why the study?
Patients with sarcomeric HCM have a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death than those without, but the reason for this increased risk is poorly understood.
Does multiparametric CMR detect greater microstructural and metabolic abnormalities in sarcomeric HCM compared to non-sarcomeric HCM?
Does multiparametric CMR detect greater microstructural and metabolic abnormalities in sarcomeric HCM compared to non-sarcomeric HCM?
Multiparametric CMR reveals that sarcomeric HCM patients accumulate greater microstructural and metabolic abnormalities at a younger age, which correlates with increased arrhythmic risk.
Sarcomeric HCM linked to more fibrosis and disarray on CMR; leaves open prospective validation for arrhythmic risk stratification.
Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with pathogenic sarcomeric gene variants (Sarc+ HCM) have a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) compared to those without (Sarc- HCM). The reason for this increased risk is poorly understood. Using multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, we evaluated hypertrophy-matched Sarc+ and Sarc- HCM patients to identify key microstructural and metabolic differences and explore associations with arrhythmic risk. Methods 39 Sarc+ HCM, 41 Sarc- HCM and 20 age- and sex-matched controls underwent cine imaging, phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS), diffusion tensor CMR, blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging, T1 mapping, and quantitative perfusion imaging. Quantitative ECG analysis was performed in all HCM patients, and extended ECG monitoring in those without prior non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Myocardial energetics were assessed using the phosphocreatine-to-ATP (PCr/ATP) ratio, oxygenation by ∆BOLD (%), disarray by diastolic fractional anisotropy (FA) adjusted for fibrosis, perfusion by myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Results Sarc+ HCM and Sarc- HCM patients had similar maximum wall thickness (20 mm vs. 18 mm, p=0.13). However, Sarc+ HCM patients were younger (51 vs. 57 years, p=0.005) and had a greater LGE burden (13% vs. 5%, p=0.007). PCr/ATP was reduced in HCM (1.64 ± 0.4 vs. 1.97 ± 0.3, p<0.001), but equally so between Sarc+ and Sarc- HCM (p=0.967). Mean diastolic FA was lower in HCM compared to controls (0.50 [0.45-0.52] vs. 0.57 [0.54-0.59], p<0.001), with Sarc+ HCM showing more pronounced FA reduction in hypertrophied segments compared to Sarc-HCM (0.46 [0.43-0.48] vs 0.49 [0.47-0.51], p=0.046), suggesting greater myocardial disarray. MPR was similarly reduced in both groups, but Sarc+ HCM patients exhibited more blunted myocardial oxygenation (∆BOLD 9% [7-11] vs. 12% [10-14], p=0.012). PCr/ATP, diastolic FA, and ∆BOLD independently associated with NSVT. Lower diastolic FA was associated with prolonged QTc intervals (r=-0.34, p=0.010) and greater QTc dispersion (r=-0.30, p=0.018). The presence of one of these CMR abnormalities in the most abnormal quartile associated with a nearly fourfold increased risk of NSVT (OR 3.8 [1.8-8.2], p<0.001), and two or more increased the risk almost fifteen times. Conclusion We show for the first time that Sarc+ HCM patients accumulate greater microstructural and metabolic abnormalities, including more fibrosis, myocardial disarray, and impaired oxygenation, at a younger age than Sarc- HCM. This increased cumulative burden of abnormalities may underlie the heightened arrhythmic and SCD risk in Sarc+ HCM. Key novel markers including PCr/ATP, diastolic FA, and ∆BOLD were independently associated with NSVT and repolarization abnormalities, highlighting their potential future role in arrhythmic risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashkir et al. (2025) studied this question. Sarcomeric HCM patients had 2.6-fold more fibrosis (13% vs. 5%, p=0.007), greater myocardial disarray (FA 0.46 vs. 0.49, p=0.046), and worse oxygenation (∆BOLD 9% vs. 12%, p=0.012) than non-sarcomeric.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: