Key result
Immunosuppression linked to ~59% lower risk of death, transplant, or relapse in virus-negative myocarditis.
Why the study?
Does immunosuppression improve prognosis in patients with biopsy-proven virus-negative myocarditis?
Does immunosuppression improve prognosis in patients with biopsy-proven virus-negative myocarditis?
In a large multicenter registry, immunosuppression was associated with improved prognosis in biopsy-proven virus-negative myocarditis, while heart failure presentation, lower LVEF, and non-lymphocytic histology predicted worse outcomes.
Supports immunosuppression consideration in virus-negative myocarditis; hypothesis-generating, challenges consensus, and requires RCT confirmation.
Background Diagnostic and prognostic features in adult and paediatric myocarditis are insufficiently characterized, and evidence supporting immunosuppression (IS) use in BP virus-negative myocarditis only comes from monocentric studies. Purpose To analyse diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic features of biopsy-proven (BP) or clinically-suspected (CS) myocarditis patients from the first Italian multicentric myocarditis registry. Methods Retrospective (2000-2022) and prospective myocarditis patients were included, recruited in centre #1, centre #2, center #3 and centre #4. Predictors of death, heart transplantation (HTx) and/or disease relapse were assessed through multivariable regression models. Results We included 1458 patients, EMB was performed in 681 cases; lymphocytic myocarditis was the main histological type (89%), followed by eosinophilic (2.2%), giant cell (1.9%), and polymorphic (1.2%). Patients were aged 48 years (IQR 34-60), mainly Caucasian (95%), and male (68%). Compared to CS cases, BP cases were older at diagnosis (43 vs. 33 years) and more frequently had heart-failure (HF, 58% vs. 8) or arrhythmic (17% vs. 7%) presentation. BP patients indeed more frequently presented with HF (29% in III-IV NYHA class vs. 2%,) and less frequently with acute viral symptoms (22% vs. 45%). On baseline ECG, BP patients more frequently had left bundle branch block (LBBB, 9% vs. 2%), and lower echocardiographic LVEF (37% vs. 57%). IS was used in 237 BP virus-negative cases when clinically indicated. At 47 months median follow-up (IQR 17-94), 72 patients died and 34 underwent HTx; 140 patients had at least one myocarditis relapse. At follow-up, BP patients more frequently had LBBB persistence (5% vs. 1.9%) and low ECG voltages (4% vs 2.7%) than CS cases; even if LVEF was overall preserved, it was inferior in BP than CS cases (53% vs 61%). On multivariable regression analysis, overall baseline HF presentation (OR 3.72, 95%CI: 1.51-10.7) and lower EF (OR 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.04) were independent predictors of death and relapse, respectively. Among BP patients, non-lymphocytic rare histological type was an independent predictor of relapse, HTx and/or death (OR 5.35, 95%CI: 1.94-14.8), while IS use was an independent predictor of good prognosis (OR 0.41, 95%CI: 0.20-0.81). Conclusions HF presentation, lower LVEF and rare non-lymphocytic histological types are independent predictors of death, HTx and/or relapse in myocarditis. For the first time, in a multicentre study IS use for BP virus-negative forms was identified as a favourable prognostic independent predictor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giordani et al. (2025) studied this question. Immunosuppression reduced risk of death, heart transplant, or relapse in biopsy-proven virus-negative myocarditis (OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.81).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: